Up till now I was pretty much sure that
int arr[4][5];
Then arr
will decay to pointer to pointer.
But this link proves me wrong.
I am not sure how did I get about arr
being pointer to pointer but it seemed pretty obvious to me. Because arr[i]
would be a pointer, and hence arr
should be a pointer to pointer.
Am I missing out on something.
Best Answer
Yep you are missing out on a lot :)
To avoid another wall of text I'll link to an answer I wrote earlier today explaining multi-dimensional arrays.
With that in mind,
arr
is a 1-D array with 4 elements, each of which is an array of 5int
s. When used in an expression other than&arr
orsizeof arr
, this decays to&arr[0]
. But what is&arr[0]
? It is a pointer, and importantly, an rvalue.Since
&arr[0]
is a pointer, it can't decay further. (Arrays decay, pointers don't). Furthermore, it's an rvalue. Even if it could decay into a pointer, where would that pointer point? You can't point at an rvalue. (What is&(x+y)
? )Another way of looking at it is to remember that
int arr[4][5];
is a contiguous bloc of 20int
s, grouped into 4 lots of 5 within the compiler's mind, but with no special marking in memory at runtime.If there were "double decay" then what would the
int **
point to? It must point to anint *
by definition. But where in memory is thatint *
? There are certainly not a bunch of pointers hanging around in memory just in case this situation occurs.