The other answers here show some ways you can contort different varieties of regex to do this, although I think it does turn out that the answer is, in general, “don’t do that”. Such regular expressions are much harder to read and probably slower to execute than just combining two regular expressions using the boolean logic of whatever language you are using. If you’re using the grep command at a unix shell prompt, just pipe the results of one to the other:
grep "alpha" | grep -v "beta"
I use this kind of construct all the time to winnow down excessive results from grep. If you have an idea of which result set will be smaller, put that one first in the pipeline to get the best performance, as the second command only has to process the output from the first, and not the entire input.
grep matches, grep -v does the inverse. If you need to "match A but not B" you usually use pipes:
grep "${PATT}" file | grep -v "${NOTPATT}"
Best Answer
grep -vis your friend:Also check out the related
-L(the complement of-l).