CSS – Difference Between SCSS and Sass

In addition to Idriss answer:

CSS

In CSS we write code as depicted bellow, in full length.

body{
 width: 800px;
 color: #ffffff;
}
body content{
 width:750px;
 background:#ffffff;
}

SCSS

In SCSS we can shorten this code using a @mixin so we don’t have to write color and width properties again and again. We can define this through a function, similarly to PHP or other languages.

$color: #ffffff;
$width: 800px;

@mixin body{
 width: $width;
 color: $color;

 content{
  width: $width;
  background:$color;
 }
}

SASS

In SASS however, the whole structure is visually quicker and cleaner than SCSS.

• It is sensitive to white space when you are using copy and paste,

• It seems that it doesn't support inline CSS currently.

  $color: #ffffff
  $width: 800px
  $stack: Helvetica, sans-serif
  
  body
    width: $width
    color: $color
    font: 100% $stack
  
    content
      width: $width
      background:$color
  

Both Sass and Less are CSS preprocessors.

From keycdn.com

A CSS preprocessor is basically a scripting language that extends CSS and then compiles it into regular CSS.

So Sass and Less don't change the functionality of CSS, as they are compiled into plain old CSS. What they do is make it easier to write and maintain CSS with tools such as mixins, nesting, variables, and more.

SCSS, which stands for 'Sassy CSS' is one of two syntaxes for Sass.
From the sass reference:

The second and older syntax, known as the indented syntax (or sometimes just "Sass"), provides a more concise way of writing CSS.

The difference

Both Sass and Less have very similar features. There are syntactical differences, for example, Sass uses $ for variables whereas less uses @ .
There are some slightly more subjective differences, this website claims that "LESS Has More User-Friendly Documentation Than SCSS", however personally I have found the SCSS documentation and examples very easy to use.